Get It On Time… 3:10 To Yuma

There was a time when Westerns engaged audiences on the level of a simple morality play where audiences knew who the good and bad guys were. James Mangold’s 3:10 to Yuma is a masterful revisionist update of the classic western and I mean “revisionist” in the best sense of the word. That is to say, not only does the film unearth a seemingly forgotten genre but it also deconstructs the familiar elements to their spare parts to explore the darker weathers of human nature and the triumph of good that can arise in between. That I completely forgot there was a previous adaptation of this Elmore Leonard story is a testament to how great this film is.

The movie opens in the home of Dan Evans (Christian Bale), a man seeking to rebuild his own life after he lost a leg in the Civil War. He is tired of the looks of shame and disdain from his wife, Alice (Gretchen Mol) and kids, William (Logan Lerman) and Mark (Benjamin Petry) and he is barely trying to keep his ranch afloat in the face of overdue loans. That chance seems to arrive to him when he seizes the rare and perilous opportunity to transport a captured infamous robber and murderer, Ben Wade (Russell Crowe) to his prison train for a payment of 200 dollars that will help cover his debts.

Dan’s posse includes Doc Potter (Alan Tudyk), Byron McElroy (Peter Fonda), a bounty hunter who has a personal vested interest in bringing Wade to justice, and others who work under railroad worker, Grayson Butterfield (Dallas Roberts). Wade has his own posse now led by his right-hand man, Charlie Prince (Ben Foster), who gazes with snaky eyes at Dan’s crew and follow them to make sure they never make it to the 3:10 train to Yuma, which will transport Wade to prison where he will immediately be hanged.

The film’s focus is really on Dan and Ben, two opposed men who know they cannot trust each other but may have to anyway and even bare their own souls to fight for their lives. Ben is a scarier criminal because he can actually intellectualize about his evil deeds with erudite irony. He is smarter than anyone else can catch on and intuits his situations so quickly that it dumbfounds everyone including himself.

His philosophizing of his hedonistic behavior becomes a source of temptation for Dan, the hero who fears what hidden darker side he will unleash in his quest to redeem his status by bringing Ben to justice. That’s made more complicated when William sneakily tags along and seems eerily fascinated by Ben’s machismo posturing. Such ideas bring greater depth to the gun battles that happen in between where Ben’s violent nature can hurt but also help the livelihood of the posse against other unforeseen enemies.

To make this complex character study come to life, director James Mangold has rightly picked great actors like Christian Bale and Russell Crowe to embody them. There is good acting you recognize and greater acting you hardly notice and when Bale and Crowe exchange dialogue, we reflect on the meaning of the words instead of realizing how well they are really delivering them. Their eloquent conversations make us hardly anticipate another action scene and have us guessing who will be the last man standing.

Watching this film, the best he has ever directed, finally made me understand the common theme that runs through all of his vastly different films – people who seek balance and stability despite their dissatisfaction with their place in the world… 3:10 to Yuma does just that with great brevity. Its most insightful message is how after all the shooting and mayhem, the man who can fight with his words rather than his guns or his fists is the one who truly wins.

http://moviejohn.blogspot.com/2007/09/310-to-yuma.html